Pages

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Extracts of NST Live Session with Online Readers

With Annie (NST Reporter) on the left and Datuk Syed Nazri, 
the NST Group Editor on the right during the Live session. 

I have just attended the New Straits Times Live chat with online readers. I find the session interesting with varieties of questions. Below are some excerpts of the session of which I have summarized and categorized. Enjoy reading!

On Malaysia Politics

Q: What is the biggest challenge to Najib and his deputy??

A:

1. To reform UMNO and BN ... to make it a more people friendly party.

2. To regain the support of the non-malays and at the same time to hold tight to the Malay support

3. To reach out to the younger generations that BN is the party of choice and the party of hope.  

4. To overcome economic challenges confronting the nation

5. To continue to ensure racial harmony and peace since the intense politicking has affected to a certain extend racial relationship in Malaysia.

6. Finally the government must deliver what it promise tak boleh cakap tak serupa bikin

 

Q: Do you think that the 4 failed by-eelctions by BN is a referendum to Najib's administration??

A: I think its only three by-elections and I think its not fair that the by-elections is referendum of Najib's administration. He became the Prime Minister on the 3rd of April and the by-election was held on the 7th. Whether he likes it or not he has to carry the baggage of the previous administration. In by election, local issues often play a prominent role.   Since voters would want to take this opportunity to vent their frustrations if local issues are not resolved. I think its only three by-elections. It is not fair to say that the by-elections are referendum on najib's administration. He became the prime minister on April 3.

 

Q: Besides your career fortune, u do need to consider your nations obligations upon serving the MCA for more than 20 years, we still someone who can speak for right of rakyat. Your ideas and opinions are our ONE MALAYSIA dream, NOT 1Malaysia UMNO's dream instate.

A: Najib's satu Malaysia is very clear that every malaysian is a state holder in the country and as a state holder we are entitled to all rights and priviledges as enshrined in the constitution.

 

Q: Our PM initiate the 1Malaysia slogan. How practical is it? We often hear or see people said - Chinese - Chinese Malaysian / Indian - Indian Malaysia. We should address ourselves MALAYSIAN rather than indication of the race of it... Please comment.

A: One Malaysia slogan means every rakyat malaysia irrespective of race will be treated fairly and equally by the government that when we are a Malaysian chinese and I practice Chinese culture and speak my mother tongue it does not make me in any way less malaysian.


Q: Isn't it too little too late for Najib to claim credit for removal of bumi quota, when it's being forced on Msia due to wto/gatts?

A: Who else can claim credit? He is the prime minister, he chairs the cabinet and the decision was made by him.

 

Q: Datuk Seri, what is your take on the future that one day the PM of Malaysia will be of another race?

A: Possible. If there is hope and dream, there may be light at the end of the tunnel.

 

Q: Good Day Doctor, I am one of your frequent blog visitors and I like the way your critical thinking endure... Question, What if u were appointed as Education minister, how would you perceive the best policy that fit in the 1malaysia slogan?

A: There is freedom of education and every Malaysian is entitled to pursue his educational academic goal. No hindrance should be placed by the government for the advancement of Rakyat in achieving this goal. The government can help the Bumiputra but must not deny the opportunity or retard the progress of the non-bumiputra as far as education is concerned.

 

Q: Datuk Seri, what is your take on the chaos in Perak State Assembly?

A: It is obvious that the Barisan Nasional has a simple majority. However, the way the state government was constituted was done in haste and they should have gone through a proper state assembly sitting and passed a vote of no confidence against the PKR state government before they formed the BN government. Because it was done in haste it looks as though BN was out to grab power.

 

Q: How do you think BN is handling the Perak issue?

A: Both sides have gone to the courts. Now everybody is anxiously waiting the court verdict. BN could have handled it better. They have neglected managing the perakians feelings. So there was bad PR on the part of the BN's government.

 

Q: You've stated some good articles in your blog esp. improvement of the goverment policies and process. Do you think that your ideas is accepted and being analyze for the improvement...?

A: As  a component party of the BN we have our internal channel to articulate our thoughts to the BN leaders. And I hope as promised by Najib that his government will listen to the voices of the Rakyat and not a government talking down to the Rakyat.

 

Q: Why is BN afraid of dissolving the Perak ADUN and call fresh elections across the whole state of Perak? It is clear that most Malaysians vote for their representatives based on their political affiliation ie BN or PR. With the 3 PR MP deciding to be independents, it can be said that the current Perak government no longer represent the wishes of the Perak People. Is BN afraid of losing to PR again?

A: As rightly pointed out by you with the support of the 3 PR adun, BN has a simple majority. We may not have the stability it is still a simple majority.

 

Q: salam sejahtera datuk seri chua soi lek..the perak MB says sivakumar can still be speaker if he is friendly. its easy said than done. can you comment?

A: Even in partisan politics, both the parties can be friendly. They need not necessarily be confrontational if they understand the meaning of true democracy.

 

Q: God bless u, how long to be changed? until 2020, we want it soon before 2011 Dr. Chua, please do it for the nations!

A: We are changing

1. liberalisation of certain economic sectors from tourism, health to financial including removal of the 30 per cent quota of the Bumiputra

2. The long standing conversion issues involving one of the spouse and the children,the Cabinet made a long awaited decision which is today welcome by a lot of Malaysians.

3. We are promised more to come. There would be changes to reflect the government is listening to the voices of the Rakyat and it cares for the Rakyat.

 

Q: Hello Datuk Seri, what has gone wrong and what quick wins are needed to be done by the goverment in order to build the confidence of the rakyat and to bring back their support to BN? Thank you.

A: Be fair to all races. Government leaders must walk the talk. Serve with passion, be humble and sincere. Decision made must be democratic, fair and accountable. It must demonstrate that it cares for the Rakyat. The welfare and well being of the Rakyat is the Government's top priority. No more slogan shouting.

 

Q: Why are we not getting the truth? Our leaders dont walk the talk. Hope you tell all, and the same goes to the other leaders too, Politics is clean but the politicans make it dirty.

A: Its true. Politicians makes politics dirty.

 

Q: Do you agree that BN should stay away from the coming Penanti state seat by-election in Penang? What do you think of BN chances there?

A: I agree that BN should boycott the Penanti By-election. Why let the PR to call the shot. It is obvious that a lot of this by-elections are orchestrated by PR.

 

Q: Do you think Eli Wong should quit? Considering her case was 'different' to yours...

A: Eli Wong did the right thing of admitting, apologising and going off. Since the party supported her, she has every right to continue. Come the next general election, the Rakyat will pass the verdict. Good Luck to her.

 

Q: Doc, please shed some lights into the PKFZ scandal and how it shld be resolved?

A: PKFZ scandal can be resolved as promised by the minister of transport that he will be transparent and accountable.

 

Q: Being a Johorean, what do you think of the controversial crooked bridge to Singapore? Should it be built as strongly recommended by former PM Tun M?

A: Having a bridge ,we need the cooperation of the Singapore Government. A unilateral decision by the Malaysian Government without the cooperation of the Singapore Government will give rise to a lot of legal problems which will occupied a lot of time and money of both the governments.

 

Q: Datuk Seri, do you fear that come the next general elections and BN is not longer the ruling government?

A: I have no fear. In fact, I am confident that BN will be the government with a bigger majority in Parliament  and possibility of winning two of the four opposition states.

 

Q: Does the Johorean still support BN these days. I believe the support of non-Maly were toward PR and the Malay support have divided into two. Could BN lose more seat in Johore in the PRU-13? Do you think PR would topple BN in the next GE?

A: Johor has always been the BN fortress but if there is a split within UMNO, MCA then we may lose some seats.

 

On Crossing Over

Q: Dear Datuk, is it true you will be leaving Barisan and join the opposition party?

A: I have given all my answers in my interview with the Nut Graph that I would leave only when I do not have a proper political platform to continue to function. I still have faith in Barisan Nasional if BN can change and reform. I still believe that BN with a track record of 52 years can still lead the nation. Najib and Muhyddin can form a good dynamic team if they can be in touch with the Rakyat, say the right thing and do the right thing. We need experienced leaders to manage a multiracial country like ours.


Q: I guess it would better for you to leave the party

A: Well I have served the party and it has given me the opportunity to serve for the last 25 years.I still have hope that I can still continue to contribute to the party and the nation.


Q: Welcome on board, hope to seek comments upon Dr. Chua to leave the sinking boat and make full use of his political talent to save the nations not only Chinese community.

A: MCA is going through a bad time after the 308 general election. We need to reform and change. If we can do that then I don't think we will sink.


Q: I have a feeling that you have been approached by party Gerakan, or vice versa, and if really so, I believe you and your supporters may consider Gerakan rather than PKR, (of course, only if you consider leaving MCA, after all, i don't know how you can stand being marginalized there), don't you think so?

A: To be honest, I never considered joining Gerakan.

 

Q: Is it true that you have been invited personally by Anwar Ibrahim to join PR? And that if you crossover you will bring your son and a few ADUNs over??

A: There have been attempts made by the PKR for me to jump ship. But, I have not reached the crossroad yet. When I am about to jump I will let you know. My son was elected   as BN candidate and its only fair that he either continue to serve as a BN or if he wants to jump ship he has to resign.

 

Q: 80% NTV7 viewers support u to leave the "Ostrich's Boat" why wait? wasting ur life and nations money! Do u hear our voices, nations voices - it is multiracial's voices upon u. Dear Dato' Seri.....

A: I still have faith and confidence in BN under Najib and Muhyiddin provided BN change and reform and fulfill its promise of being a really, truly multiracial party.


Q: Dato' Seri, in politics we need to be loyal to the party and also be a team player. Your loyalty to the party is being questioned now - you considering to leave MCA and join PKR ? To be a team player, first you need to work and cooperate with your President - have you done that ? Have you shown to him that you have no agenda to overthrow him and that you want to ensure that he leads the party and you would be there to assist him.

A: You have not read my answer correctly under what circumstances I would   leave MCA. I have been a team player for the last 25 years in the party.


On MCA

Q: MCA president accused u of "creating news for personal agenda" recently, short of calling u a liar. As the MCA deputy president, would u comment on it?

A: Well I am surprised why he call me a news breaker. I was just telling the truth to the Nut Graph with no personal agenda. If I do not tell the truth I may be accused of lying. All politicians needs the newspaper as much as the newspaper needs us. So to be called a news breaker is not as bad as a party breaker. Its up to the Rakyat who is the party breaker now?

 

Q: Your party President does not seem to be extending an olive branch to you after the party elections although you were democratically elected as the second man in the second biggest component party in the ruling coalition. His actions are seen by the public to be divisive and petty-minded. On the other hand, you seem to be above personal and petty politics practised by your President. Do you think that the culture in MCA is such that the winner takes-it all and second prize is no prize at all? How are you going to serve the party if your President reduces you to a non-factor? Do you think that his actions will damage BN's standing in the eyes of the public? Or would the BN be stronger if he side-lines the Deputy President?

A: You are right that I am above all the personal innuendos and I have taken the path not to respond to any comment which are of personal in nature that I am elected to serve the party and that all the elected party leaders are only trustee of the party for a limited three years term. And it is up to the MCA members and delegates to see who is acting in the best interest of the party.

 

Q: Dr. Chua, do you think that the MCA President is acting more like a dictator?

A: Your judgement is as good as anyone and you are entitled to draw your own conclusion. This is what democracy is all about.

 

Q: It seems that your president do not appreciate you and your talents despite being elected by MCA grassroots. Have you reach the point of no return with Ong Tee Keat?

A: I said it tolerance has its limit. Unfortunately it is difficult to quantify not like the H1N1 pandemic virus where there is various level of preparedness.

 

Q: Dr. Chua, your chief, Ong Tee Keat promised a lot along with you during the MCA Party Elections, how is the delivery progress going ?

A: They have been some reforms but it is small steps and slow. What the Chinese community wants to see is big steps abd bigger reformation.

 

Q: Datuk Seri, are saying that you have a proper political platform under the current MCA president OTK?

A: I wish I have a bigger and better platform than what I have at present.

 

Q: Are you frustrated at MCA President Ong Tee Keat ? Who doesn't seem to think that you are fit to hold any positions due to the scandal.

A: I am surprised that he has not taken step to close ranks within the party. As to whether I am fit to hold any position due to the scandal, I leave to the public to judge. I have said it before No Man is Perfect, Everybody makes mistakes and that includes me.

 

Q: Do you think you still can work well with Mr. Ong TK? is MCA doing something for the sake of msian chinese? Why i cant see it or even feel it?

A: I said I am a team player and I can work with anyone if there is sincerity and commitment. To say that MCA is not doing anything for the Chinese community is not fair. We have perception problem that we are not doing enough.

 

Q: Dato Seri how do you cope with being MCA no 2. My observation is that I see/hear/interprete no harmony between you and mca no 1 or rather mca no 1 and you ? Please answer sincerely. Thanks.

A: Life has its ups and downs, moments of joys and frustrations, it is never a straight line with that attitude I survive.

 

Q: Dtk seri, if NST organise a trilingual debate between you and ong tee keat would you say yes??

A: We live in a society where people cannot accept differences of opinion, even in debate. And I see no purpose in having a debate between the number one and number two of the same party.

 

Q: What is your plan if giving an opportunity for you to revamp the MCA organization. Younger Chinese generation is shying away from MCA organization due to the bad impression given...

A: We have to convince the Chinese that the Chinese expectations and needs is MCA agenda. We need to demonstrate to the Chinese that we are sincere in fulfilling our role in protecting the interest of the Chinese community. We cannot be low profile in resolving our issues . We cannot avoid sensitive issues and we should have the guts to confront it. We need to reach out to the Chinese especially the younger generation. So our interaction should not be confined just to MCA members.

 

Q: Dr. Chua, how do you connect 1Malaysia with MCA's Chinese Agenda ?

A: There is no conflict between the One Malaysia concept and MCA chinese agenda. The one Malaysia concept is all embracing all races and chinese is second major race in the country and through MCA the government becomes more sensitive to the needs of the chinese community. So strictly there is no conflict.

 

Q: Dr Chua is race based party like MCA, MIC and UMNO still relevant?...since the government is trying to rebrand itself into 'One Malaysia'...

A: Race base party takes care of its own ethnic group. But it has to think in the context of a multiracial country. It is still relevant except that we have to reform that whatever we say and do cannot be just one particular ethnic group. We have to reach out to all races,

 

Q: Datuk Seri, would it be possible for MCA and DAP to work together?

A: It is possible for MCA and DAP to work together if it is for the common good of the Malaysians. Nothing is impossible in politics.

 

Q: What do you feel about the reputation mca has for links with the underworld?

A: There has been allegations from time to time that MCA leaders being linked to the underworld. But nobody has come forward to provide us the evidence pin pointing any particular leader.

 

Q: Datuk Seri, do you agree that the senior members and leaders blocking those young people in MCA?

A: There is some truth that some senior leaders do block young people but often this is a breakdown in communication. The young people is ina hurry and the older people feel that the younger people need a longer time to learn the rope and this is the source of the friction.

 

Q: How bad is the Chinese community sentiment at the moment?

A: The anti-government feeling among the Chinese is palpable. We need to address this issue and Najib and Muhyiddin is aware of it that the government need to reach out to the non-Malay community more frequently. Government also need to demonstrate that it delivers what it promise the Satu Malaysia which is all embracing all races.

 

Q: To remain relevance to today's political landscape, do you think MCA shld remain its present form of chinese-based party (ie if it ain't broke dont fix it) or change to be a multiracial party?

A: We will continue to be a chinese based party but we cannot be talking all Chinese. We should be more malaysian in outlook and move towards issue centric party rather than ethnic based party.

 

On Personal and Health Matters

Q: Sir, the fact that your son won the Labis seat to me confirms the fact that you are popular there and would win if you contested in the next election. What would then happen to your son? Would he still be interested in contesting and where would he contest? Of course, I understand that it is up to, first the party president to decide and then the BN chairman, but would he still contest?

A: Hopefully he will be able to contest come the next general election.

 

Q: Datuk, do you have a blog to disseminate your ideas and reforms since you don't have much say in the party?

A: I am surprised that you did not know my blog. I have been blogging for about a year plus. My blog – http://drchua9.blogspot.com

 

Q: Hello Datuk Seri, despite being an ex-Health Minister, you are still very controversial. How do you handle this?

A: By remaining calm, sincere in your answer and believing what you do.

 

Q: Datuk, some lawyers have argued that s377A which criminalises oral sex is obsolete. Do you agree with their view?

A: I definitely agree with you that archaic laws should be discarded.

 

Q: DS CSL - I like to put my question in Malay if u dont mind. Dalam kes Video, DS maklumkan bhw DS telah diperangkap oleh musuh2 politik dan DS mengetahui siapa mereka. Perkara ini telah lama berlaku dan sehingga kini tiada hasil siasatan polis dimaklumkan. Sebagai rakyat, kami hairan kerana perkara ini amat mudah utk disiasat memandangkan pemasangan CCTV perlu dibuat dgn pengetahuan pemilik hotel tapi sehingga kini tiada hasil dimaklumkan. Siapakah dalang/musuh DS dlm perkara ini?

A: Terima Kasih kerana amat perihatin hal peribadi saya. Saya pun tak faham bagaimana sampai hari ini polis masih gagal mengenalpasti siapa yang memasang video tersebut.

 

Q: In politics, as the adage goes, there are no permanent friends and no permanent enemies? Care to comment.

A: Very true. Often  it is common interest that binds politicians together. The question is whether the common interest is personal interest or rakyat's interest.

 

Q: Does politicians have close friends, I mean really close not the backstabbing ones?

A: Yes. Politicians do have good friends and I have a lot of good friends if not how do I survive over the years politically.

 

Q: Datuk, you are multi-lingual and fluent in Bahasa Malaysia. How do you do this especially your Bahasa Malaysia which is superb?

A: I was brought up in a Malay kampung in Johor. I used to be the chairman of the Malay debating society in school.

 

Q: I read your family is very well known in Batu Pahat especially your dad with the Malay community. Is it true? Just enlighten us. Not interested in your politics.

A: It is true that my father is well known in the Malay community. He was operating provision shop, cold storage shop in a largely malay community. In those days they used to have this Hutang business for my father's shop. A lot of them never pay and that is how he became popular.

 

Q: YES Dato. I am from Batu Pahat. My dad ada hutang your father. But he was such a gem in our town. Although he was never awarded any pingat. But he had contributed a lot to the Malay community.Your father was an example of 1MALAYSIA.That was in the 1960s.God BLESS YOU

A: Thank you Faridah. Please send me some kuih muih as a settlement for Hutang

 

Q: If u are reborn again, what would likely be your carrer path or life aspiration?

A: I will continue to be a medical doctor.

 

Q: Datuk, as a personal question, what is your favourite food and ideal holiday destination?

A: My favourite food is hokkien mee. The best holiday destination is New Zealand especially Auckland,Christchurch and Queens Town.

 

Q: On a personal matter, what do you do during your free time? Do you jog or go to the gym for your exercise?

A: I exercise everyday from 6.45am from 7.45am - brisk walking and some chinese Tai Chi.

 

Q: Dato Seri, you are a doctor. I want to stop smoking. Any good tips? success stopping for 1 month than I smoke again.

A: Simple .... sheer determination that smoking will deprive your family of a husband and a father. How irresponsible can you be. Then you will quit.

 

Q: My husband & I are in our 60s. What is your best sex advice for us?

A: Be healthy, exercise, no smoking, keep down your weight and have a lot of imagination.

 

Q: Datuk Seri, I am 60 yrs old. A year ago I have a quintuple bypass and has stopped smoking since. What should I do to stay healthy and avoid another heart attack. I exercise an hour every day.

A: Besides exercise is your food and rest. Eat more vegetables and fruits. Avoid sugar, salt and oily stuff. Do not keep late nights and wake up early for exercise.

 

Q: Datuk, if you are given one wish, what are your hopes for Malaysia?

A: Peace, stability and development.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Live @ NST Online


I have been invited by The New Straits Times editorial to the NST live session this coming Thursday at 3pm at as stated as above. It is a brand new interactive platform that enabled the invited guests go "live" to interact with the readers online. As for my session tomorrow, I welcome you to join me at http://www.nst.com.my/

Here are some information to help you to understand how it works:

  • There's nothing to do during a Live Event other than read, watch and occasionally send in a comment or vote in the polling questions.

  • It's not a chatroom. You go to largely find out what the writer has to say. An open chat with thirty or more readers turns into poor, disjointed content very quickly.

  • Your comments are published at the Writer's discretion. The Writer can view all comments sent to them but only they can publish your comments for everyone to see.

  • Our 'autoscroll' feature ensures you're always shown the newest content without having to refresh or scroll your screen. You can turn this on or off by using the controls at the bottom of the Viewer Window.

  • Subtle sound effects alert you to new content as the writer publishes it. This can also be turned on or off as needed.

(Pic & info courtesy from nst online)

Local Authority and Star Rating


The Housing and Local Government Ministry published the rating of 97 local governments recently. I have no idea on the criteria for arriving at a particular star. What is expected is where 65% of the local authorities have 2 star and below. No local authorities have 5 stars. Only 10% of them have 4 stars. Most of the 4 stars are either City Councils or Municipal Councils.

We have essentially a 3 tier government – the federal, state and local authorities. Often the weakest link in the government is the local authorities. This is the government agency that is nearest to the Rakyat - the front liners. Often the Rakyat draw conclusion of the government delivery system based on the local authority’s performance as it is most intimately linked to Rakyat. It provides very basic but essential services: from garbage management, drain cleaning, issuance of business license and basic infrastructure development. Hence, its performance has an impact at the local level to the Rakyat.

Hence, I noticed while all local authorities in Kelantan fared badly, the voters supported their state government. However in Penang and Selangor where the local authority has better star rating, the Rakyat voted against the state government. This elicits 2 questions:

1. Bigger issues at play during the 308 election.
2. The star rating is flawed.

Local authorities functions with great limitations especially financial and human resource limitations. This is one government’s institution that has not changed much as the Nation and its people move forward. Most local authorities financial position is best describes as disappointing. There is not much avenue for increase in revenue collection as local authorities are dependent on license and house assessment as the main source of its revenue. In a rapidly developing township then there is substantial increase in revenue, e.g: Kuala Lumpur City Council, otherwise the local authorities’ expenditure will continue to go up while its revenue remains stagnant.

The lack of professional staffs is another big setback to local authorities. You can have a situation where a technician evaluate plan involving a highly specialized and technical building submitted by a multinational company.

A lot of local authorities have to be dependent on state government and federal government handout for development fund. Hence, one can imagine the conflict when the state government and federal government are from different parties. In theory, funding should be on needs and not on political affiliations. This is naked partisan politics. Even within the same party there is partisan politics!

The councilors have more roar than bite. It takes time and experience to deal with the local authority’s staff with its bureaucracy and hidden agenda.

In the long term there is need to revamp the local authorities by:

1. Increase source of revenue
2. More professional staffs
3. Better governance and accountability by staffs
4. Local authorities staff should be subjected to transfer out of the local authoty and not a closed service (but this need to amend the constitution)
5. There are pros and cons about councilors being elected by the local residents
6. Development grant from state and federal government depending on the population size within the local authority. This is besides the capital grant for maintenance of essential services. This will reduce inter-party politicking. Until then, I cannot foresee much improvement in the delivery system within the local authorities. The PR state government is coming to term with this political reality.



高峰論壇:老二或出走 馬華風雲起


转载自:东方日报/ 陳利良

蟄伏已久,馬華風雲人物拿督斯里蔡細歷終於出手,再次成為政治焦點。

不過,焦點不是長期盛傳中的召開馬華特別代表大會,而是放出「此處不留爺,自有留爺處」的風向球。

蔡細歷日前接受網絡媒體《The Nut Graph》訪問,出人意表的承認民聯正極力招攬他過檔,甚至透露有人希望他說服其子,即柔州拉美士國會議員蔡智勇辭去國會議席,以製造一場補選。

首相拿督斯里納吉即刻反駁蔡細歷或會跳槽的傳言,並表示蔡細歷是國陣的忠誠支持者,不會過檔至反對黨。

內政部長兼巫統副主席拿督斯里希山慕丁則希望馬華儘快處理蔡細歷被挖角的問題,並指蔡氏是十分瞭解國陣政治鬥爭目標的資深領袖,倘若他真的跳槽到民聯,確是令人惋惜。他呼籲深查箇中原因,找出問題癥結,對症下藥,解決問題。

有趣的是,馬華總會長拿督斯里翁詩傑以「不知情」、「未閱讀(新聞)」來回應,不願置評。馬青總團長拿督魏家祥則非常妙,以蔡細歷應知什麼來回應。

馬華與巫統領袖的迥異反應,基本上也反映了蔡細歷在黨內與國陣的矛盾處境。

對納吉和希山慕丁而言,蔡細歷出走對刻受華裔選票大量流失衝擊的國陣來說,無異是雪上加霜。雖然蔡細歷未必會有太多馬華黨員跟隨跳槽,但對馬華的形象與士氣,卻會造成重創。

而馬華黨員看到馬華惡鬥至此地步,也會心灰意冷,甚至淡出政壇。

這位黨中二當家,魏家祥兩年前親耳聽到他公開表示應該忠於黨,不能離開黨,如今竟會毅然要離開服務長達25年的家,準備投奔敵營,到底發生了什麼事?

蔡細歷最後出走,並不令人驚訝。他贏得黨選之後,卻備受黨內排斥,眾所周知。借用總會長翁詩傑的話,這是客觀的事實。

據蔡細歷自稱,中選為署理總會長後,僅出席會長理事會及中委會會議,沒有受到其他人咨詢任何問題。

蔡細歷雖因勝選而被委任為馬華政府政策監督局主任,卻又因他格外積極,將炮口對準馬華本身內閣部長的部門猛轟,頻頻發表批判性的精銳言論,引起黨內一些人士不滿,而痛批他含有個人議程。

公正黨的黃潔冰事件,雖說與蔡細歷光碟風波本質上有落差,但公正黨內不止沒有對她落井下石,還處處維護她。

再看蔡細歷,光碟風波已過了年餘,他在辭盡黨職後,成功打一場漂亮的翻身戰,東山再起。但黨內某些人依然對他窮追猛打,最近中央代表還收到他光碟的照片。

對比之下,蔡細歷雖是飽嘗冷暖的老驥,但心中難道會完全沒有感受嗎?蔡細歷是個思路清晰,深具謀略及大格局思維的政治人物,當下馬華的眾領袖中,尚無人能出其左右。

這次放出「離家出走」的訊號,進可攻、退可守,實屬非常高明的策略。

他只表示,有人拉攏過擋,沒說清楚令伯心中意思如何,當時反應如何。然後,他又不忘重申,若有朝一日選擇離開,是基於無足夠平台讓他施展抱負,令他有感愧對於選他出任署理總會長的中央代表。

馬華黨選半年後,風雲再起,一場暴風驟雨即臨。除了考驗翁詩傑的智慧,或也將決定馬華未來的命運。

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Malaysians’ preoccupation with food


Being a multiracial country, we have variety of food from local to international cuisine. In short, we are not short of choice. Every new development invariably will be filled with hawker centres and food outlets. Recently, I went to Kota Damansara at night for supper and shocked to find that every street is filled with restaurants and hawker centres. You are spoiled for choice.

Eating out is now a favourite pastime and to many people, a daily routine. Recently, the local newspaper reported that 40 percent of the people eat out daily. Interestingly, price is of prime concern. The food hygiene is not placed on the top priority. This survey is not surprising since it is common to find some well-known food outlet where the level of hygiene within the premise can be quite appalling. There are even well known hawker centres where toilet paper is used as tissue paper and if you go to the toilet, you will lose your appetite, probably for days. Because we are not concern with hygiene, a lot of food operators pay scant attention to hygiene and cleanliness.

We have such preoccupation with food that it is not uncommon for Malaysians while having lunch to talk about dinner, where to eat, what to eat and who to invite. We are not fussy about whether we are eating the right food. When it suits our taste and it is within our budget, we just eat it. To most Malaysians, healthy and unhealthy food is alien to them. As far as the taste is great, it is good. In this respect, the ladies seem to show a better understanding of the type of food to be eaten. There is a famous saying “you are what you eat”, but Malaysians don’t really care very much as long as it is delicious. Hence, it is not surprising that overweight and obesity register double digit growth every year among Malaysians. Most Malaysians are also not aware that obesity is the mother of all illness.

Because of our preoccupation with food, there is a mushrooming of food outlet. It cannot be denied that competition is keen. After all, the economic pie will be getting smaller. However, there seems to be an understanding among food operators that they should not undercut each other in food prices. Hence, there may be competition, but not a price war. In fact, over the years, food prices have slowly but steadily gone up.


The NutGraph II:国阵会被取代吗?

The Nut Graph 专访

尽管在自己党内陷入进退维谷的窘境,但马华署理总会长拿督斯里蔡细历医生仍然想信,若国阵愿意拿出政治决心,该政盟还是有望重获选民的信心。

他认为,如果国阵成员党凡事能针对课题、去种族化来看待问题,国阵在首相拿督斯里纳吉的领导下将有机会进行改革。

然而,这位前内阁部长不认为,目前的马来西亚社会可以完全抛弃种族政治,接受完全以课题为基础的政治模式,该理想政治需经过多两届的全国普选才能落实。

他接受网络媒体TheNutGraph访问时指出,民联提倡的“平等政治”待给人民新的希望,可是在大马的政治实现里,那并不容易实现。

因此,由巫统主导的政府必须要展示他们能公平对待各种族,对全民一视同仁。

关于首相纳吉

记者:敦阿都拉卸任前曾想办一场国阵大会以促进种族关系。纳吉是否应该继续此计划?
我认为需要办这场大会,好让国阵各成员党能对国阵和政府未来的方向取得共识。308以后,许多成员党的领袖认为只要他们敢怒敢言,情况就会好转。他们认为,这么做就足以表现他们勇于为社群争取,为民请命的一面。

可是,去谈论或争取一些你的社群本来就应得的东西,问题就解决了吗?这些要求能被满足吗?

所以呛声并不足够。马华近来一直在呛声也发表了许多文告。
你可以呛声,但你的声音是否被正视?我不知道这样是否有效。身为国阵的一员却没完没了地互呛,我们是否传达正确的信息?人家会说,你也是政府的一份子,干嘛不停叫骂?你若办事有效,只需上谏几句问题不就解决了?倒不必像反对党一样。反对党因为无法接近首相,所以必须敢怒敢言。

你如何看待纳吉的领导及他倡议的“一个马来西亚”?
他是时候付诸行动了。今天的人民已经不接受口号这一套。政府必须展示公平对待全民的决心。纳吉的决定必须体现民主精神和透明化,并且要证明现任的政府认真治国,有信于民,不分种族让全体人民成为国家的主人。既是国家的共同主人,大家应该享有宪法赋予的权益,而政府不能言行不一。他们也要能体恤人民的领袖。

纳吉上任后出巡民访是很好,但没有解决问题。民访后应该进行对话,以了解特定社群的需求和心声。只是走动和握手是一项很好的政治手法,但年轻一代不会尽信。我们应该坐下来和他们进一步交谈。

我在我的选区也是这么做,我常户外走访选民,所以我能生存至今。即便是现在,我也如此管理我的区会,我目前是马华巴株峇辖区会主席。我经常四处访问居民,以协助当地的议员解决问题。走马看花式的访问,或在咖啡室里闲聊是没有意义的,这样并不会得到选民的支持。

你如何评估纳吉上任首个月的表现?
他做得很正确,这也是伯拉在位时人民引颈常盼的,其中一项是开放服务和金融领域,我认为他的安排巧妙细微。

与其检讨新经济政策,他把新经济政策里的一些东西慢慢去掉….如果全面检讨,可能会让许多马来人不悦。但如果只废除其中一些而避免全面检讨,这不失为“安内攘外”的政治良策。

第二,是长期未决的改教课题….过去我曾参与一个以拿督斯里黄家定、拿督斯里莎丽扎以及总检察署为首的内阁委员会,研究其中一伴侣改教的争议性课题。我们多次争论,而我们所要的结果,纳吉在一个内阁会议就议决了。对于这一点,我确实敬佩他。

但内阁的决定被批没有任何法定地位。
这很简单。政府作出一项决定后,接着是总检察署的工作将之纳入法制。

纳吉已经触怒回教法律师以及其他保守组织。
是的。这是很大胆的做法。

你预见国阵会因此受影响?
在多元种族的国家,任何看似偏袒特定族群的决定必将影响另一族群。但我们希望人民可以宏观地看待整个事件对家庭和谐的影响,以及公平性。

你认为纳吉能够团结所有人吗?
可以,如果有政治决心和悟性。纳吉必须以积极的行动,证明现任政府不是归属巫统;现任政府不只推行有利马来人或特定阶层人民的政策。我想,这是他必须发动的最基本改革。

看看目前的内阁及巫统的阵容,你认为他们能给纳吉所需要的支持吗?他们是中间领袖吗?
我认为纳吉能全面掌控巫统。他是党内的强人,他应该利用这项委托权改革巫统、加强巫统,使它奉行中庸政策。巫统的决定不能只照顾巫统党员,而要顾及全民,才能真正落实“一个马来西亚”概念。


关于马来西亚华人

大选已过一年,见证了民联政治和管理后,你认为大马华人的趋向如何?
我认为华人仍然不亲国阵政府。最近我出席了一个由巴生民间组织主办的讲座,与会者逾千人,而我能强烈感受那股反政府的情绪。

(大马)华人有很高的期望,民联则进一步提高他们的期望,好像….这是单一种族社群。他们忘了这里是多元种族国家。他们忘了不管由谁执权,政府必须平衡各社群的需求、敏感元素及理想主义。

民联即已提高华裔和印裔的期望,希望最终不会落得虎头蛇尾的结局。

你认为他们把期望提高到一个不切实际的水平?
是的。

你这么说,是因为你在国阵里清楚了解要平衡利益很困难……
是的,一切回到权衡。就以实际问题来看,行动党在雪州和霹雳州拥有最多的州议员,但他们深知州务大臣不可能由(大马)华裔出任。所以理想主义、平等、期望,应该建立在这个国家的政治现实及务实状态上面。

308后的(大马)华人都往哪走?
他们认为有了选择。过去几场补选已清楚显示,他们认为自己有选择(国阵和民联),而他们只想尝试更换选择。所以国阵还剩2至3年来改变他们的观念。国阵必须要证明没有其他政党能取代(之),因为今天人民认为民联可以取代国阵。

但国阵无法为(大马)华裔及印裔带来人人平等的希望…
所以国阵必须要改革。纳吉过去数周所做的一切为国阵带来希望。
民联不断提高期望,那是因为他们不当权,不需要去实践。他们还在政治蜜月期,所以人民没有对他们苛刻批判。

人民对国阵严厉非难,因为国阵掌政多年,大家对其失误和弊端了如指掌。反观民联只(在数个州)执政一年,所犯的错误和弱点尚未显见。人民也对民联比较宽容,他们认为民联还在学习阶段。所以,国阵要力证不能被取代。

可是那将带领我们重回种族政治,人民不正要摆脱这种局面吗?
我不能确定我们是否能远离种族政治。看看改教课题,谁提出反对?你会发觉巫统一直都噤若寒蝉,反观回教党和公正党的回教人士不断抗议。

对我而言,要以对事不对人的理想政治取代种族政治的想法仍十分遥远。非马来人必须要接受,民联提出的这点很正确,但是无法在近期内实现的。

时限?
也许在下两届大选吧。你必须明白,所有马来人不会轻易放弃他们的特权。不可能。只要有马来特权,就会有种族政治。简言之,我们需要的是一个公平的政府,一个能照顾全体人民的政府。贫困的马来人应该获援助;同样的,贫困的华人也必须被照顾。我们必须要有来自中央的核心政策,根据人民的需要和经济需求提供帮助。

有人预测2020年大马的华人人口将萎缩20%。那维护他们政治力量有多强大?
我想我们应该探讨,种族政治和政党在那时候是否还切合事宜。这点一直备受争论。我们应该问,如果马华和国大党不存在,(大马)华裔和印裔会受苦吗?

假设巫统和回教党能夺得民心,人民会觉得他们不再需要你。如果巫统了解华裔和如同了解马来人的需求,那则不需要种族性质的政党。这也是备受争议的论述。人民不断地问,没有马华,大马华人就会被剥夺什么吗?

为何人们现在才置疑这些?
政治情况已变。我国独立时,巫统、马华和印度国大党共同争取这一切。当时也是马华和国大党为各族群奋力争取这些权益。他们的角色意义深远,必须确保各社群在英军离开后,继续享有宪赋给的权力。因此当时的马华和国大党的角色至关重要,包括争取公民权、照顾华人新村及维持政治稳定。

可是,52年以后,我们不需要再争取这些,人民的批判意识提高,他们置疑我们或已失去政治作用了。那大马的华人究竟要什么?华小?神庙?新村?如果巫统可以解决这些问题,那对人么那而言,马华、国大党甚至是行动党也不再有角色。

巫统,一如既往地将无法走入华人社群;他们还停留在马来人议程…
你认为回教党并非如此吗?

那么华人的方向在哪儿?人口会逐渐减少?
我们的人口会渐渐减少,可是如果政府的施政对事不对人,我们还是能扮演有意义的角色,我们的权利仍旧获宪法保障,只有种族性政党的角色将受置疑。

你说我国需要经历多两届的大选,才会落实对事论事的政治。
没错,大概是2020年吧。

你对大马未来的种族和谐发展还是乐观的?尽管少数族群的人口逐减…
噢,我们都活在希望中。我们希望明天会更好。平均每天有20人在公路意外中丧命,我们不会希望自己的明天会这样。每一个人都会有希望。

Monday, May 4, 2009

The Nut Graph II: Will BN be replaced?





By Deborah Loh/ TheNutGraph

DESPITE his own dilemma about remaining in the MCA, party deputy president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek believes the Barisan Nasional (BN) has a chance at regaining voter confidence, but not if it doesn't muster the political will to change.

He thinks the BN has a shot at reform under new Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak if the political parties can move towards becoming issue-centric, rather than remaining race-based.

Yet, the former cabinet minister doesn't think Malaysian society can fully forsake racial politics to embrace issues- and ideology-based politics until after two more general elections.

He says while the Pakatan Rakyat has lifted people's hopes with its "new politics" of equality, Malaysia's realpolitik will not let such a message be realised so easily.

The Umno-dominated government, therefore, has to show it can be fair and just to all races.

Chua speaks to The Nut Graph in the second and final part of an exclusive interview about Najib's early days, the shrinking Chinese Malaysian population, and the future of race-based parties.

On Prime Minister Najib

TNG: Before Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi left, he wanted to hold a BN convention to strengthen race relations. Should Najib still proceed with it?
I think there is a need for a BN convention so there can be a consensus among all the component parties on the future direction of the BN and the government. After March 2008, a lot of component party leaders felt that if they became more vocal, then things would be okay. They think they've shown to their own community that they've dared to speak out and demand the things their community wants.

But does that solve anything, whether by talking or by asking for things that your community should have — will it be fulfilled?
So speaking out is not enough. The MCA has been doing that a lot with a lot of different statements lately.
You can speak out, but will your voice be heard? I don't know how effective it is. By being vocal as a component party, are we sending the right message? People on the outside will also say, you are part of the government, why should you make so much noise? If you were really effective you could whisper and get it done. You don't have to behave like the opposition. The opposition needs to be vocal because they don't have a channel to the prime minister.

What do you think of Najib's leadership and his 1Malaysia?
It's time for him to walk the talk. People nowadays are not taken up by slogans. This is a time when the government must show and demonstrate that it is committed to treating everyone fairly.

He must be democratic and transparent in his decisions, must show that the government of the day means business, that it will deliver what it promises, and that it is making a Malaysia where all people, irrespective of race, are stakeholders. And as stakeholders, they are entitled to what is due to them under the constitution, and that the government will not say one thing and do another. They want to see that the leaders are in touch with the rakyat.

Najib's walkabout was good, but it doesn't solve problems. The walkabout should be followed by dialogue to know what that particular community wants. Just walking around and shaking hands is good political spinning, but the younger generation is sceptical about it. We should take it a step further by sitting down and talking.

I do that in my constituency, that's how I can survive, I walk around and talk. Even now I still do in my own bahagian, because I'm still ketua bahagian for MCA Batu Pahat. I help the local wakil rakyat by going around and talking to people. It's no point walking around and having coffee and creating a hoo-ha. Will that translate into support?


How do you evaluate Najib's one month so far?
He's done the right things that people have been waiting for during Pak Lah's time. One is the liberalisation of the services sector and now the financial sector. I think he's done it in a subtle way.

Instead of calling for a review of the New Economic Policy (NEP), he's slowly taking away some of the... how do I put it... things contained within the NEP. By calling for a total review, he will probably upset a lot of Malay [Malaysians]. But by dismantling some of it, without calling for a total review, it's a smart political move that can win votes on both sides.

Secondly, the conversion issue, which is a long-standing issue... I used to sit in the cabinet sub-committee chaired by the deputy prime minister with (Datuk Seri) Ong Ka Ting, (Datuk Seri) Shahrizat (Abdul Jalil), and the Attorney-General's Chambers, to study religious conversion issues when one spouse becomes a Muslim. We argued a lot. And what we wanted has all been achieved by Najib in one cabinet meeting. So I really salute him for that.

The criticism about the cabinet decision is that it has no legal bearing.
Very simple. Once the government makes a decision, it's now up to the AG's Chambers to put the legal system in place.


Najib has angered the syariah lawyers and other more conservative groups.
Sure, it's very bold.


Do you foresee repercussions for the BN because of this?
In a multiracial country, any decision made which is seen as favouring a particular ethnic group will have repercussions from the other ethnic group. But we hope that people look at the total picture of fairness, of harmony of the family.


You believe Najib will be able to hold it all together?
If there is political will and good sense. Najib must demonstrate through positive actions that the government of the day does not belong just to Umno. That the goverment of the day doesn't just implement policies that benefit only Malay [Malaysians] or a certain segment of people. I think these are the most fundamental changes he has to initiate.

Looking at the cabinet he has, and the new Umno line-up, do you think those people can lend him that kind of support? Are they centrist enough?
I think Najib has full control of Umno. He's strong within Umno, and he should use this mandate to reform Umno, to strengthen Umno, to make it pursue a policy of moderation. Umno should not only make decisions that takes care of Umno members, but decisions that have a bigger picture, that really are "1Malaysia".


On Chinese Malaysians

One year after the general election, where do you think Chinese Malaysians are, after getting a taste of Pakatan Rakyat politics and governance?
I think the Chinese [Malaysians] are still disenchanted with the BN government. I just attended a forum organised by Chinese associations in Klang where 2,000 over people attended, and I could feel the mood wasn't pro-government.

Chinese [Malaysians] have high expectations. Pakatan Rakyat has raised their expectations to be very high. So high, that it is as if... this is a mono-ethnic community. They've forgotten that this is still a multiracial country. They forget that the government in power, whoever it is, has to do a very fine balancing act. Balancing the needs, the sensitivities and the idealism of each community.

Pakatan has raised Chinese and Indian [Malaysian] expectations so high, and let's hope that it will not be anticlimatic.

You think they've raised it to a level where it's unrealistic?
Yes.

You say this because you're in the BN, you've seen how difficult it is to balance interests...
Yes, it's all about balancing. Look at the practical problem — DAP has more ADUNS (state assemblypersons) in Selangor and Perak, but still they know the menteri besar cannot be a Chinese [Malaysian]. So idealism, equality, expectations, should be grounded on political realities and pragmatism in this country.

Where are the Chinese [Malaysians] now one year after March 8?
They think they have a choice. It's very obvious from the by-elections that they think they have a choice [between the BN and Pakatan], and they just want to try it out. So the BN has two and a half to three years to change this perception. The BN must show that no other party can replace [it]. People now have the perception that the BN can be replaced by Pakatan.

But the BN doesn't present that kind of hope of equality for Chinese or Indians [Malaysians]...
That's why the BN must reform. What Najib has done in the last few weeks is something that has brought hope to the BN.

Pakatan has raised expectations, and because they're not in power they don't have to deliver. People are not critical of them because they are enjoying a political honeymoon.

People are critical of the BN because the BN has been in power for so many years that they know all about its faults and defects. Whereas Pakatan has only been in power one year [in some states], so faults and weaknesses are not so obvious. People are more forgiving, they say Pakatan is on a learning curve. The BN must show that it cannot be replaced by Pakatan.
But that would bring us back to race-based politics, and people seem to want to move away from that.
Well, I'm not too sure if we're moving away from race-based politics or not. Look at the religious conversion issue, who objected to it? You find that the Umno people are more muted in their criticism. The protests are all from PAS and the Keadilan (PKR) Muslims.

To me, the idealism and utopia of issue- replacing ethnic-centric politics is still quite far off. Non-Malay [Malaysians] better accept this, that the hope that Pakatan has spun on them is correct, but it is still not achievable in this time frame.


Time frame?
Probably in the next two elections. You must understand that Malays [Malaysians] will not easily give away their special rights. No way. As long as there are Malay privileges, ethnic-centric politics will always be there. So the long and short of it is that we need a government that is fair. A government that takes care of all its people without neglecting needs. If Malay [Malaysians] are poor, they get help. If Chinese [Malaysians] are poor, they will also get help. It should be based on needs and economic necessity. That should be the central and core policy.
There are projections that by 2020 the Chinese Malaysian population will shrink to about 20%. How strong will be the political clout of the community to preserve what's theirs?
I think we should talk about whether race-based political parties are relevant anymore. This is being debated. We should ask, if MCA and MIC do not exist, will Chinese and Indian [Malaysians] suffer?

If Umno and PAS can reach out, then people might think we don't need you. If Umno knows the needs of the Chinese and the Malay [Malaysians], then there's no need for ethnic-based political parties. This is being debated. People are asking, without the MCA, will the Chinese [Malaysian] be deprived of anything?

Why are people questioning this now?
The political scenario has changed. At the time of independence, Umno, MCA and MIC fought together for independence. It was the MCA and MIC who fought for the rights of Chinese and Indian [Malaysians]. They played that meaningful role. They had to sit down and think about how, when the British leave, each community in this country will enjoy rights and privileges under the constitution. So the MCA and MIC had important roles to play at the time: the role of providing citizenship, of looking after [the] Chinese in the new villages, of ensuring political stability.

Fifty two years later, we don't have these things to fight for. So people are more critical, they are wondering if we have outlived our political usefulness. What are the Chinese [Malaysians] fighting for? For schools? For temples? For new villages? But even Umno is aware of all these problems, and if it can reach out to the Chinese [Malaysian] community, even without the MCA or MIC, people say you'll have no role to play. No role for the DAP, even.

Umno, as it is, is not going to reach out to the Chinese [Malaysians]; they're still stuck with their Malay agenda...
You think PAS still isn't stuck on their Islamic agenda?

So where are the Chinese [Malaysians] headed if, numbers wise, they are going to be smaller?
We may be smaller, but at the end of the day, if the government is issue-centric, then we'll still have a meaningful role to play. Our rights are still protected by the constitution. It's the ethnic-based political party whose roles will be questioned.

You said it will be at least two more elections before politics can become issue-centric.
Yeah, that will be almost 2020.

So you're hopeful, then, about the future of racial harmony in Malaysia even as minority groups grow smaller...
Oh, we all live on hope, anyway. We hope we get well tomorrow, we hope we don't die in a road accident. Twenty people die in road accidents daily on average. Everybody has hope.


(pics & text courtesy from the nut graph.com)

Friday, May 1, 2009

Happy Labour Day

休息是为了走更长远的路。劳动之余莫忘身心健康。
祝大家劳动节快乐
Happy Labour Day !

Welcome to my Blog

As a concerned MCA member, I am trying my best to help in the process of rebuilding and repositioning of the party.

Therefore, I welcome party members and members of public to post your constructive suggestions and opinions on my blog on how to rebuild and reform the party, eventually enabling MCA to regain support from all party members and the community.


Thank you for your suggestions.