----->郑修强（左起）、蔡细历及张秀福，柔佛州振林山巡视道文华小工程进展。
（新山22日讯）道文华小拨款风波朝野角力，马华总会长拿督斯里蔡细历表示，民主行动党至今还沿用「50年不变」的方式为自己宣传，然而华社仍相信这种方式，对他而言是很「微妙」的。
他表示，在道文华小日前获得教育部拨出的300万令吉课题上，行动党通过最简单的方式为自己作宣传，即通过批评和指责马华和政府，惟还是得以取得想要的效果。
「这种是50年不变的方式，但是到今天华社还是相信，这是最『微妙』的。」
他说，无论政府是否向道文华小拨款，行动党都是赢家。他也认为，「高喊口号」、批评和破坏对手是行动党党最简单的政治行为。相反，董家教三方在才是真正捍卫华教的一批人。 「当政府批准拨款，他们（行动党）就说政府是受到他们的压力；如果政府没有给拨款，他们又会说马华『当家不当权』、无能。所以两方面他都胜不会输。」
蔡细历今日下午前往振林山道文华小进行巡视工作，并召开记者会时，针对日前柔州行动党在获知道文华小获得拨款后，对外声称「火箭呛声，才有拨款」的言论，作出如此回应。
他强调，道文华小日前所获得的300万令吉拨款，是经过他和副首相兼教育部长丹斯里慕尤丁讨论后的结果，而并非与行动党「发不发文告」有关。
另外，对行动党也指华小向华社筹款，令华社必须承担「双重税务」的说法，蔡细历指出该党并无因此被「抽税」。
他说，由于全国华小担任董、家协的人士，有90%来自马华，即使募款，有关人士也是向周围的马华党员募集。
「如果真的要说是抽『双重税务』，被抽的也是我们的党员，不是他们的（行动党）。」
询及教育部是否已将300万拨款转入道文华小户口时，蔡氏仅以「这些是行政手续」，没有再进一步说明。
陪同蔡细历进行巡视工作的，包括马华振林山区会会长兼道文华小建委会财政张秀福、道文华小建委会主席梁德福、董事长林宇田、校长陈美薏等人。
另外，无独有偶行动党副宣传秘书兼沙登区国会议员张念群，今日回柔佛州庆祝中秋节途中，顺道到士姑来皇后国光一校进行拜访，了解B座教室情况。
在拜访了国光一校后，继程丽宁镇道文华小巡视，察看该校目前的工程情况。在拜访了道文华小后，她不忘奉劝马华振林山区会主席张秀福，不要为了赢得候选人的资格，输掉了华社的尊严与未来。
陪同她前往道文华小的包括行动党士姑来州议员巫程豪、行动党柔州社青团团长陈泓宾、振林山社青团团长曾笳恩、行动党振林山区妇女组主席黄祥鸾等。
東方新聞網 22-09-2010
2 comments:
Dear Dato Seri Dr.Chua Soi Lek
According to a new media source Democratic Action Party advisor Mr. Lim kit siang, recently described the Malaysia economic
Transformation plan as another version of China Mao
Zedong's "Great Leap Forward"
movement.I do not agree with him, but I do not feel this statement is totally harmful.
The mentioning of Great Leap Forward, at least remind us of the
of peaceful and prosperous environment in our country to
enable us to concentrate our attention on the commercial production of goods and services at the same time also gain
extra foreign exchange to enhance the economic performance through international trading.
China in the cold war era was subjected to sanctions imposed by
western countries had to allocate a lot of resources to the production of military goods in order to safeguardthe country , consequently the livelihood of its people was badly affected.
To fully evaluate the Mao's Great Leap Forward movement , we also need to consider the damage that had been to China as a result of the second World far and the Korean War.
Shortly after the establishment of the new China, China was engaged in the Korean War, which lasted for 3 years.
Million of china soldier were sacrificed and billions of dollar
was spent by China in that war which won them their pride and dignity.
After the Korean war, China who was troubled by sanction
and neded to settle the war debt
Plagued by insufficient foreign exchange to import industrial
goods and heavy machineriesr for
its industrial development
and military expansion, China had to depend on its own
people to rebuild the country and expand its military
strength And thousand of backyard furnaces were set up
throughout the country to increase the output of steel
needed for making heavy equipments and warfare weapon
Place where coal was not available trees were chopped down
to supply fuel ,pot , frying pan and other ferrous article
were supplied as Scrap ,Shrine and clan house were also torn
down to provide brick needed to built backyard furnaces.
1/6 of the china population at that time including students ,
housewife were engaged in the steel making .This is
similar to the saying in the chapter of Lao Tsu Text which
sound like this When the world is in order horses run free to
fertilize the field , When the world is not in order pregnant
horse is sent to battle field also. The large scale production
of steel during the great leap forward movement was a
failure and resulted in deforestation and mass destruction
of traditional building .This is mainly due to the poor
management and lack of metallurgical knowledge.
。 I do not think the Great Leap Forward is a total failure, the
China who has gone through the hardship become
more stronger, and tougher as evidenced its tremendous
success in heavy industry, technology, sports, cultural and
economic achievement today.
。 I do not agree with Mr. Lim Kit Siang of comparing the
Malaysia Economic Transformation with the Great Leap
Forward, the former was launched based on military
strategy ,but the latter was implemented to improve
standard living of Malaysia people using modern corporate management and scientific approaches
GOH HOE HOE MCA KEPONG
Comrade Dato Dr.Seri Chua Soi Lek, the president of MCA
民主行动党领袖林吉祥先生在新媒体的一篇文章中，提到首相拿督斯里纳吉提倡的经济转型，让人联想到中华人民共和国在毛泽东主席领导时的大跃进，使人对两者有负面的影响。
我认为这两者是风马牛不相及，而且我也不认为大跃进是完全失败的，要全面评估大跃进，就应该了解冷战时期中、美、苏三国的利害关系。
新中国成立之后，中国就一直面对来自美国和苏联的威胁。为了保卫国家，中国必须增加钢铁的生产，以制造重型机械及武器以作扩军之用。
为了达到钢铁生产的目标，中共领导人也指示在全中国各地设立后院高炉，以破碎的铁制品作为废铁原料，以及烂的木器及树木作为燃料以生产钢铁。这种作业方法是失败的，因无法生产素质好的铁，而失败的原因在于干部根本没有炼铁的知识。
大跃进不能与经济转型相提
但从另一个角度来看，中国人民在冷战时期所经历的艰苦，使中国人更坚韧，而成就了日后中国在体育科技及经济的势力。
区域局势不稳定时，当权者就得动员人力当军，把更多资源用于生产军需品，而忽略民生困苦。
大跃进不能与经济转型相提并论，因前者以军事需要作为考量；而后者是以民生的需要为先。
毛主席倡导的大跃进是以唯物辩证作为基础，而首相纳吉所提倡的大马经济转型计划，有注入现代企业管理的元素。
吴和豪
Post a Comment