Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Local Authority and Star Rating


The Housing and Local Government Ministry published the rating of 97 local governments recently. I have no idea on the criteria for arriving at a particular star. What is expected is where 65% of the local authorities have 2 star and below. No local authorities have 5 stars. Only 10% of them have 4 stars. Most of the 4 stars are either City Councils or Municipal Councils.

We have essentially a 3 tier government – the federal, state and local authorities. Often the weakest link in the government is the local authorities. This is the government agency that is nearest to the Rakyat - the front liners. Often the Rakyat draw conclusion of the government delivery system based on the local authority’s performance as it is most intimately linked to Rakyat. It provides very basic but essential services: from garbage management, drain cleaning, issuance of business license and basic infrastructure development. Hence, its performance has an impact at the local level to the Rakyat.

Hence, I noticed while all local authorities in Kelantan fared badly, the voters supported their state government. However in Penang and Selangor where the local authority has better star rating, the Rakyat voted against the state government. This elicits 2 questions:

1. Bigger issues at play during the 308 election.
2. The star rating is flawed.

Local authorities functions with great limitations especially financial and human resource limitations. This is one government’s institution that has not changed much as the Nation and its people move forward. Most local authorities financial position is best describes as disappointing. There is not much avenue for increase in revenue collection as local authorities are dependent on license and house assessment as the main source of its revenue. In a rapidly developing township then there is substantial increase in revenue, e.g: Kuala Lumpur City Council, otherwise the local authorities’ expenditure will continue to go up while its revenue remains stagnant.

The lack of professional staffs is another big setback to local authorities. You can have a situation where a technician evaluate plan involving a highly specialized and technical building submitted by a multinational company.

A lot of local authorities have to be dependent on state government and federal government handout for development fund. Hence, one can imagine the conflict when the state government and federal government are from different parties. In theory, funding should be on needs and not on political affiliations. This is naked partisan politics. Even within the same party there is partisan politics!

The councilors have more roar than bite. It takes time and experience to deal with the local authority’s staff with its bureaucracy and hidden agenda.

In the long term there is need to revamp the local authorities by:

1. Increase source of revenue
2. More professional staffs
3. Better governance and accountability by staffs
4. Local authorities staff should be subjected to transfer out of the local authoty and not a closed service (but this need to amend the constitution)
5. There are pros and cons about councilors being elected by the local residents
6. Development grant from state and federal government depending on the population size within the local authority. This is besides the capital grant for maintenance of essential services. This will reduce inter-party politicking. Until then, I cannot foresee much improvement in the delivery system within the local authorities. The PR state government is coming to term with this political reality.



4 comments:

Ahjamal said...

Dr Chua I must admit that you are one leader that want to serve the country. While the others in your MCA are only serving the UMNO master and just legs carriers When will MCA come back to the old days in 1960s . I was a serious MCA members in Melacca and Tun Tan was our leaders Tun Tan was a real gentleman and very kind to us. I just hope you will follow me to leave MCA for the good of the nation.

Jeffrey Chew said...

Dr Chua

Speak without fear of favor.

I swear said...

Dr Chua,

I think Kelantan local authorities may get low ratings but are they really worst off than Selangor? I really doubt this. Also, bulk of the period cover by the rating system relates to BN, not PR.

Selangor being a 'developed state' has got the inefficient local govt, given so much financial resources that they have. Think Pandan and Selayang and how dirty and 'lawless' the areas are. People who travelled frequently noticed that even Bangkok is cleaner than KL. Anyway, to be fair, KL is cleaner than London.

And to Ahjamal, both Tun Tan (father and son) appeared to be gentlemen and to say they have greatly contributed to welfare of Chinese is full of crap. Study history critically and analyse what they have done to enrich themselves at expense of Chinese. I actually think the father was a coward and exploiter. Many years ago I was naive and believed whatever the historians wrote but now I do not anymore.

Like the Buddha said, do not believe just because some 'well known/famous/noble/holy' people said so, analyse and investigate and then decide whether it is true or not.

Have a happy Vesak day.

Paddy said...

I'm surprised your talking about this when its been a while since the report has been released. At least someone shows some sort of interest in local government.

I agree with the part about electing councilors, there are pros and cons.

Pros

-Electing councilors based on merit and ability
-Encouraging the population to vote(in regards to any kind of voting), by showing them that they ultimately hold the power to make our representatives responsible and accountable
-Decisions will be more aligned to what the people really want
-Power corrupts, unless we live in some sort of Utopian society, which we don't

Cons

-The ability for a councilor to make a decision without any political backlash can be a good thing to drive positive development, because sometimes, people resist change and fail to see the bigger picture. Sometimes its not easy to do a good thing without receiving some form of backlash from the public. For example, an elected councilor might not be reelected should he/she make a unpopular decision


Ultimately, the ability to elect your councilor should be seen as a possibility, it should manage to get some of those lazy bugge*s off their bums and serve their people

Welcome to my Blog

As a concerned MCA member, I am trying my best to help in the process of rebuilding and repositioning of the party.

Therefore, I welcome party members and members of public to post your constructive suggestions and opinions on my blog on how to rebuild and reform the party, eventually enabling MCA to regain support from all party members and the community.


Thank you for your suggestions.