郑安泉4项疑点惹猜测

video link: http://www.malaysiakini.tv/video/15865.html

今天，我受召出席马华听证会，针对马华“秘密三人小组”事件供证。听证过程约一小时。我也在较后举行新闻发布会，向传媒发表谈话。

早在2006年，来自各州的马华基层领袖和同志不约而同提醒我，党内有类似的秘密小组存在着，联络人是一名青团运前团长郑安泉，郑安泉在全国跑动会见各州马华代表时警告他们不要和我有密切的联系，因为我并非领导层属意的人。不过，那时候我并未加予理会有关传闻是否属实。

当时，我所听闻的并非“三人小组”，而是只有两个人操作的“二人小组”，成员是郑安泉及他效劳的对象－－以前是副部长，现已升正。至于黄家定和黄日升的参与，在当时并没有听说过。

今天，我向调查委员会说出我对“秘密三人小组”所了解和听闻的，我也呈上一份由无名氏寄来我家的报告，以助调查。这份长达5页的报告，详细列出郑安泉和一些领袖会面的时间、地点、事项等，包括一些支会和区会的保密资料、有人争线当候选人，条件是不能支持我等等。

由于这份报告的真伪还有保留，我因此拒绝向媒体公开报告的内容。我认为应该由调查委员会进一步鉴定内容的真实性，因为只有特委会有权侦查和召见报告里提及的人士。

我也向调查委员会表明有一些基层领袖和党员愿意挺身供证助查，条件是他们的身份绝对被保密，包括听政会须秘密进行、特委会呈给会长理事会的报告里也不能公开他们的名字和身份，以免他们在即将举行的支会和区会选举中地位受影响和威胁。

在听证会里，我也告诉调查委员会3位成员，郑安泉在不久前接受《号外》访问，并承认和当时的16楼副部长有密切联系。有关访谈引起许多猜测，特委会有必要查实以向党员交代。

我们感到狐疑：

1)年届70岁的郑安泉，虽然拥有青年团体组织经验，但何以能出任年青体育部的顾问？
2)郑在《号外》访问中指因为必须久等应约见副部长，所以副部长答应其要求，让他在部门设一个办公室。他何以、何须能获得如此好待遇？
3)郑非马华党员，更非马华高层，如何有各支会、区会、领袖的详细资料，况且这些资料只有特定高层才能获取，我当了20多年区会主席和近5年副总会长，也没有这么多的资料。
4)如果郑只是青年事务的顾问，为何马华代表会找他帮忙筑桥争取当候选人、当议员？我任马华副总会长时，除了柔佛州的同志，并未曾接获其他党同志的类似请求。

“秘密三人小组”被揭发后，也有同志说认为我的光碟事件可能与它有关。不过，我不会随意猜测，因为我没有确实的证据。我也多次强调，光碟事件已经过去，我不会继续追究。不过，对于这个秘密组织存在的虚实，马华必须严正以待。没有人可以接受马华组织里，有着一个秘密小组密谋对付自己的同志，这种事情让党内外人士都会对马华失去信心，是马华的一大耻辱！
-----------------------------------------

Translated version from Sinchew Daily:

Former MCA Vice President Datuk Seri Dr. Chua Soi Lek said that he started to hear about a “secretive 2-man group” in 2006 and it was not a “3-man group” and further said that he did not hear the President, Dato’ Seri Ong Ka Ting’s name being mentioned.

He said that from what he knew, the people involved in the “secretive 2-man group” was Tee An Chuan and another individual who used to be a deputy minister but has since been promoted to become a full Minister.When further asked about the identity of the Minister, Chua said “he used to be deputy minister on the 16th floor but is now a Minister…you (reporters) are all very smart, you all know who that is.”

Chua was speaking to the press after the hearing session held in MCA headquarters earlier today but he did not reveal the name of the person who “used to be a deputy minister but now has been promoted to a minister”.He said that since 2006, some grassroots warned him and told him that Tee An Chuan had approached them to remind them not to work closely with Chua Soi Lek because he was not a person favored by the leadership and that Tee was working for a deputy minister.

He said that he had told the independent investigation committee the above information and admitted that at that time, he thought that those statements were used to launch personal attacks against him, so he did not bother about it.He expressed that he had informed the committee the names of party members who were willing to provide relevant information and news but he hoped that the hearing session could be held under two circumstances, one is to have the hearing session in private and that the witness’ identity should remain confidential when the report of the snoop squad is handed over to MCA’s Presidential Council.

He pointed out that after he had been informed of the existence of snoop squad, he faced a lot of challenges including the sex dvd matter and this made some supporters started to suspect that the matter is connected to the snoop squad. However, he said that he is not willing to make any assumptions since the police has been unable to confirm who is the culprit behind the sex dvd, so as to be fair to the party involved. Chua also said that he had proposed to the committee to clarify Tee’s doubting statement in the interview with Special Weekly:

1) Why does a 70 year old man, although with rich 'experience' become a Youth advisor?

2) Tee kept saying that he went to the relevant deputy minister’s office often but because he needed to wait for long time, so he requested for an office in the deputy minister’s office. As a result, his request was permitted, this statement raises doubts;

3) Tee claimed that he knew very well MCA’s organizational struture even up to personal details of delegates and this is very suspicious as even as a VP, Dr Chua had no access to these details.

4) Why those members who wanted to become candidates must speak to Tee?

“I have been a division chairman for over 20 years and vice president for nearly 5 years and yet I do not hold any organizational information, but then, why can an outsider obtain information that is unknown to even many high-level party members? How did this outsider get this information so easily? Why did party members who wanted to become candidates have to meet up with this outsider and not me (a vice president)?” he said.

He revealed that he received a 5-page anonymous report and the content basically said detailed Tee's activities, of who he met up with including the venue and time.“There is very detailed information in the report, including which branches or divisions support who and whoever that wants to become MPs or ADUN cannot support me,” he said. He said that the report was in Chinese and that it was sent to his house and he found out about it from his family. He said that he has handed the anonymous report to the committee in order to assist the investigation.